Cannabis Legalization Zine Now Available!

We are excited to announce the release of our Cannabis Legalization zine! 

For those who may not know what a zine is, a zine is a small, self published, folded mini magazine (hence the shortened “zine”) with strong roots in DIY and activism scenes. 

This mini publication covers what will be legal, illegal, and expungable if HB 1/HB 837 are passed by vote this November. We will be distributing physical copies around the city, but if you can’t get your hands on one, don’t fret, we have a PDF version on our website! 

Huge thanks to Baltimore Harm Reduction Coalition for the assistance in making the zine a reality! This is the first of  many zines to come as we develop our library!

BALT’s Second Statement Concerning Findings In SAO’s Do Not Call List

June 14, 2022 12:00 pm EST

Baltimore, MD— June 14, 2022-- On May 25, 2022, Baltimore Action Legal Team received a list of 307 names of officers with integrity issues. The list contains 301 unique names after eliminating duplicates and non officers. Disclosure of this list came after two and a half years in court and only after the Court of Special Appeals ordered its release.

The list does not contain the reason or rationale for placing an officer’s name on the list.  BALT has requested further information from BPD, but we have yet to receive any files.  The Baltimore City Law Department (who represents BPD in litigation) is actively denying our ability to determine why an officer may be on this list. The law clearly states that these officer’s files must be disclosed, but the Law Department refuses to disclose files on any officers. 

Without having access to the actual misconduct files, we still have found shocking results from reviewing this list.

Of the 301 names: there are 187 officers, 52 sergeants, 2 majors, 1 lieutenant colonel, 1 deputy commissioner, and 41 without a specified rank. Due to an MPIA request submitted by OJB, we know that as of November 2021, 198 of the names on the list are active. The list contained 11 Gun Trace Task Force officers. 

Of the 301 names, there are at least 3,400 cases attached to these names as “officer” or “complainant”  between the District and Circuit Courts for Baltimore City. Preliminarily, this includes about 2,585 cases at the trial level, 172 post conviction matters, and 698 cases on appeal. This does not consider the number of convictions resulting from involvement of officers on the list.

We will continue to release information as it is obtained.

###

BALT is dedicated to politically-conscious lawyering and to using creative, collective solutions to support the Movement for Black Lives in Baltimore.

For more information, press only:

Andy Krew

communications@decrimmaryland.org

For more information on BALT:

www.baltimoreactionlegal.org

BALT’s Statement Concerning Release of SAO’s Do Not Call List

May 25, 2022 8:00 pm EST

Baltimore, MD— May 25, 2022--  On December 6, 2019, BALT filed an MPIA request for the names, ranks, badge numbers, job assignments, and dates of hire of 305 individual police officers the State’s Attorney referenced during a statement before the State Commission to Restore Trust in Policing.  The State’s Attorney stated her office maintained a list of 305 officers with credibility issues that put them in jeopardy from testifying.  The State’s Attorney denied our request stating the information was considered personnel records and are exempt from disclosure.  BALT disagreed with this conclusion and pursued legal action to obtain the list.

On October 14, 2021 (678 days after our initial MPIA request), the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland issued a ruling that the State’s Attorney Office did not have supervisory authority over BPD officers and the list was not a personnel record. As a result, the court ruled the State’s Attorney should release the list.

Today (901 days after our initial request), the State’s Attorney Office sent us a list of 307 names. The document contains first and last names and none of the other identifying information mentioned in our initial request or the Court’s ruling. We are currently reviewing the list and will release a follow up report/statement that reflects our findings.

BALT sought this information because an officer’s integrity matters.  The entire system (from initial engagement with a police officer to determining whether someone should be held pre-trial) relies on a police officer’s word. There is no room for officers with integrity issues on the stand or on the street.

This list is one piece of the puzzle in our fight for transparency. Along with this barebones list of names, BALT has been fighting to obtain misconduct records from BPD. Though these records are disclosable by law, the City Solicitor’s office has refused to hand over a single officer’s file, acting as a gatekeeper to these records. We have repeatedly been forced to take them to court to stop protecting BPD misconduct.

BALT will continue to fight for transparency and accountability, as we have seen no change from BPD, and we will not count on the police or justice system to correct themselves.

There is no accountability without transparency.

###

BALT is dedicated to politically-conscious lawyering and to using creative, collective solutions to support the Movement for Black Lives in Baltimore.

For more information, press only:

Andy Krew

communications@decrimmaryland.org

For more information on BALT:

www.baltimoreactionlegal.org

BALTIMORE POLICE AGREE TO TRACK FEE WAIVER REQUESTS AND DISCLOSE RECORDS TO SETTLE PUBLIC RECORDS LAWSUIT

      FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: May 16, 2022

Contact:                                                       

Jennifer Safstrom

Civil Rights Clinic & ICAP

Georgetown University Law Center

jennifer.safstrom@georgetown.edu

BALTIMORE POLICE AGREE TO TRACK FEE WAIVER REQUESTS AND DISCLOSE RECORDS TO SETTLE PUBLIC RECORDS LAWSUIT

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Baltimore City Police Department (BPD) will begin tracking data on how it responds to fee waiver requests under the Maryland Public Information Act (MPIA) as part of a settlement agreement in litigation brought by Georgetown University Law Center’s Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection (ICAP), with representation from the law school’s Civil Rights Clinic and in partnership with Baltimore Action Legal Team (BALT).

ICAP brought suit after making a request under the MPIA—Maryland’s state-law analog to the federal Freedom of Information Act—to BPD for information about how BPD handles requests for fee waivers. The MPIA allows public agencies to waive the fees associated with responding to records requests that are in the public interest. ICAP sought to gain insight into how BPD assesses fee waiver requests by examining data about who had received or been denied their requests for fee waivers in recent years.

The settlement agreement, filed in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City on Friday, provides that for each MPIA request it receives, BPD will track whether the requester sought a fee waiver, whether the fee waiver was granted, and the cost assessed to the requester. BPD will also generate and provide to ICAP a six-month report tracking this information. In addition, the agreement will result in the disclosure of 125 files responsive to ICAP’s MPIA request, at no cost to ICAP.

“Public records requests are an important tool for non-profits and individuals to hold the government accountable, and fee waivers are often critical to these efforts,” said Mary B. McCord, Executive Director of ICAP. “This settlement agreement ensures that BPD will track fee-waiver requests in a way that promotes transparency about how it applies the public-interest criteria for fee waivers under the MPIA.”

“We have long struggled to get BPD and the Baltimore City Law Department to comply with MPIA laws. They have routinely responded that disclosure of police misconduct files is not in the public interest, therefore fees for reproduction shouldn't be waived. This has effectively blocked community access to see how police misconduct is handled in Baltimore. This settlement will allow better tracking of violations and compliance. While this fight took over a year and a half, we are excited to see movement towards transparency. Without transparency there is no accountability,” said Matt Zernhelt, Legal Director with Baltimore Action Legal Team.

“Sunshine laws like the Maryland Public Information Act allow communities to effectively monitor taxpayer-funded government operations and hold public officials accountable to the people they serve,” said Lucas Hammill (3L), a Civil Rights Clinic student attorney who represented ICAP alongside Jameson Ullman (3L) and Eric Taylor (2L). “We are glad that as a result of this litigation, BPD will collect data that Baltimore residents can use in the future to monitor the police department’s compliance with the Act and ascertain what the department finds persuasive in a request for a fee waiver.”

###

About ICAP: ICAP is a nonprofit, nonpartisan legal institute at Georgetown Law focused on defending constitutional rights and values and restoring confidence in the integrity of government institutions.

About the Civil Rights Clinic: The Clinic operates as a public interest law firm at Georgetown Law, working primarily in the areas of discrimination and constitutional rights, workplace fairness, and open government.

About BALT: BALT is dedicated to politically-conscious lawyering and to using creative, collective solutions to support the Movement for Black Lives in Baltimore.